Ads

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

From "The Magars: Their History, Language and Culture"

This is a beautiful article from Facebook group "The Magars: Their History, Language and Culture"

" प्रधानमन्त्री भीमसेन थापाले आफुलाई 'वर्मा क्षेत्री' भनेपछि …।
___________________________________________

प्रधानमन्त्री भीमसेन थापाले आफु 'वर्मा क्षेत्री' भएको कुरा एउटा शिलालेखमा लेखाएर काठमाडौँको विष्णुमती पूलमा राखिसकेपछि उनलाई 'वर्मा थापा क्षेत्री' होईन भन्न मिल्दैन । प्रधानमन्त्री भीमसेन थापा 'वर्मा क्षेत्री' भन्नै पर्ने हुन्छ ।

उनले आफुलाई जे भने उनी त्यही हुन। यसमा बीचका अरुहरुले यसो र त्यसो भन्नुको कुनै माने हुदैन । उनी 'वर्मा थापा क्षेत्री' नभएर अर्थात् तल भनिएझै भएर पनि त्यसले आजको मगर समाजलाई के लाभ हुन्छ त ? केही पनि हुदैन । बरु यस्ता कुराहरुको पछि नलागेर कसरी अघि बढ्ने भन्ने सोच बनाउनु राम्रो हुन्छ । त्यस निम्ति सबभन्दा पहिलो कुरो पर्यो - 'शिक्षा' ।

र ,आजको युग अनुसारको उपयोगी शिक्षा कसरी हासिल गर्ने ? त्यतातिर सबैको ध्यान जानु पर्यो । "



Source: https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Magars-Their-History-Language-and-Culture/171605959649718

Monday, November 18, 2013

Magars History - IV ( By my friend Babs)



" The origin of Mangar tribe as mentioned in Kirat chronology is a place in the north called Shin. From there, a group of people under the leadership of two leaders came to the south. The names of the leaders were Shing Mangar and Chitu Mangar. The people of the southern country called them Tangsang Thapa which means the people came from the far away north. Later on, these Mangar tribes multiplied and were divided into 12 groups under twelve leaders and called themselves Barah Mangars.
The names of the twelve Mangars were Shinjali Thapa, Hongjali Thapa, Hungchun Thapa, Chhodey Thapa, Pudkey Thapa, Mundey Thapa, Udhro Thapa, Bairong Thapa, Ishar Thapa, Barahi Thapa, Hangyung Thapa and Hangshe Thapa.
When they came to Sikkim they settled there permanently. They built Jongs or Forts or castles, wherever they settled and called them Mangar Jong or the fort of Mangars or the castle of Mangars.
Pandit Sarad Chandra Das proves the existence of Mangars in Sikkim and Eastern Nepal.
"The legend which he heard of the Mangar tribe and the ruins of their forts and towns in the valley of Kangbachhan river in the East Nepal is very interesting; people said that the account is correct and true."
"The upper valley of Kangbachhan river was occupied by the people of Tibetan stock and the lower valley was occupied by the Mangar tribe whose king was called Sintusati Sen. The Mangar king attacked the Tibetan people and ruled over them. He extracted a heavy tax from them."
"His deputies always oppressed the people to squeeze out money from them, so the Tibetan people started to conspire against the Mangar king. One day when the Mangar chief had gone to visit the Tibetan village with many followers, they were surrounded and killed by the Bhutias. When the Mangar queen heard this sad news of her husband, she planned to take revenge on the Bhutia subjects.

"She, therefore, ordered for a grand funeral in the honour of the departed soul. The funeral was fixed to take place six miles up the river, midway between the two great
villages of the Kangbachhan valley, so that all the villagers might assemble there.
After the queen's followers had finished drinking, poisoned wine was given plentifully to the Bhutia villagers, who suspecting nothing, drank freely and all died. In this way, nearly one thousand men and women died. The infants in arms were taken away by the queen's followers. The place where this foul deed was committed was now called 'Tongsong Phug' or the place which witnessed one thousand corpses. As a result of this, a Tibetan army invaded several Jongs belonging to the Mangar queen. She had no preparation to fight the enemy, so she shut herself in one of her castles or Jongs and her soldiers defended the castle for three months.
"This Tibetan soldiers then tried to compel the Mangars to surrender by depriving them of water. At last, the queen, aware of this intention, threw all the water she had in store towards the camp. The Tibetan soldiers thinking that she had abundence of water inside the castle raised the seize and went to a distance to watch the movement of the Mangar people. She immediately collected her soldiers and pursued the enemy. When a skirmish took place, she fell fighting nobly. The rest of Mangars left their place of Kangbachhan valley and migrated towards south west direction and reached as far west as Simang Garh situated about six miles east of present Birganj of central Nepal. When their number multiplied they were divided into two groups under the leadership of Phalemi Khan and Yomchhammi Khan and spread towards eastern and western directions. Phalemi Khan led his horde towards West Nepal and settled in Palpa. Yomchhammi Khan returned to Limbuwan in the east and settled in Shanpur of Chainpur and intermingled with Limbu nationals and became Limbus of Sinjali Thapa, Rana, Aley and Pun clans.

Those who settled in Palpa of West Nepal were divided into Thapa, Akey, Pun, Burathoki, Rana, Gharti, Bohra, Roka, Chaohan, Konwar, Uchai and Roho tribes and called themselves Magar, instead of the original name Mangar.
In the East Nepal and Sikkim, the Mangars are so called because they were the children of Mang or Mong or Mongol people. The Chinese and Burmese people people call Mang or Mong for Mongolians; and ar or arui means children. So, Mangar means the children of Mongols. Most probably, it can be correct interpretation, because their complexion proves that they are no other than scattered Mongolians although before the 12th century AD there were no tribes in Central Asia called the Mongolians. There were many nomadic tribes called Kin, Kir, Kirait, Karatai,, Karakhitai, Khitai, Uigur or Hor, Monchu, Mongku, Tungut, Seljuk, Karluk, Turk, Burun, Sak, Kushan, Hun, Abar, Uichi, Kajak, Chin, Khas, Thak, Gyarung and Mangyak. They were all nomads except China. They used to live in tents and had no permanent inhabitants. Frequent antagonism and plundering among themselves were their main object. There was no such name as Mongol in the world upto the 12th century AD.
It was in the 12th century AD, when Chengiz Khan called a meeting of all the above mentioned tribes and when all the tribes unanimously elected him to be their Gurkhan or the Khan of Khans or the King of Kings, he proposed that a common name for all the separate tribes of Central Asia should be Mongol. Then all the tribes unanimously agreed and from that time only the people of Central Asia began to call themselves Mongol. Chengiz Khan himself belonged to the Mong Ku tribe and Chinese people used to call them Mong Ku Tata. A branch of this race settled in Hungary in Europe and called themselves Magiar tribe.
It appears that long before the adoption of such name of Mongol in Asia, a branch of Manchu and Tungut migrated to Korea and Japan and made their permanent home there, Similarly, a branch of Kirait, Uigur and Mongku tribes also spread towards Suchuwang or Kham, Unam, Burma, East India and Nepal. They did neither hear the name Mongol nor they claim it to be their origin.
Therefore, the Mangar tribe of Nepal must be from the composite group of Kirait and Mongku, who came to Sikkim and bacame Mangar. There are certain Lapcha tribes called Mongormu. It appears that some of the Mangar tribes might have mixed with the Lapcha tribe of Sikkim and became a Lapcha Kirat people. Further, there is a folklore among Nepalese that Mangars are a sect of Kirat people who brought sweet potatoes into Sikkim and Nepal. Specially, the Lapcha tribe called it Mangorbook or the potatoes introduced by Mangar tribe.
There is another proof of the affinity of the Mangar and Lapcha tribe in counting numbers. The Mangar tribe counts one, two,three, four,five as kat, net or nis, sam,buli,banga and the Lapcha tribe says kat,net,sam,fali,fungu. These are the evidences of the residence of Mangar Kirat people in Sikkim. Not only that, but the Mangar chiefs were so active in Sikkim that they kept on fighting with the Sikkimese chiefs upto the 18th century AD. Sikkim history mentions that the Sikkimese chiefs tried their best to bring the Mangar chief under their power by keeping matrimonial connection with them. Chhangzat Karwang, the Chief Minister of Sikkim married the daughter of one of the Mangar chiefs of Sikkim and wanted to keep friendly relation with them, but the Mangars were never influenced by the Buddhist Kings and Ministers of Sikkim. When the Mangar Chief of Sikkim understood that nothing could be expected from the Buddhist King of Sikkim they totally neglected the Sikkimese relation and the Sikkimese also dropped all the records of Mangar people from the history of Sikkim.
Still there are many places in Sikkim and East Nepal called Mangar jong or the Fort of Mangar tribe.
On the contrary, the Mangars of West Nepal prospered so much so that they formed a league of twelve Khans and established a state and called it Barah Mangrat, the central government of which was at Bhirkot. Khan means king in Magar language. Now, I write the word Magar as pronounced by Nepalese people.
According to Brian Hodgson and Captain T. Smith the league of Twelve Magars consisted of Satahung, Payahung, Bhirkot, Dhor, Garahung, Rising, Ghiring, Gulmi, Argha, Khachi, Musikot and Isma.
Each of these twelve districts had its own Khan or King, though they had agreed by common consent to regard the Khan of Bhirkot as their Overlord.
But in later period, this system of government was ceased as the Kings of Palpa, Rising, Ghiring and Rajarkot claimed independent Kings with the title of Shan Hang. Thus, they were broken into two prominent Kings of Khan dynasty and Shan dynasty. They had their own language and culture. Dhami was their religious priest. Long before the coming of the Hindu influence into their kingdoms, there was a Kirat King called Bali Hang, who had an extensive Kingdom from Pokhra to Gorakhpur and the Magars had spread from the hilly region to the Terai region.
As time passed on, the Shan Kings extended their Kingdom towards south and east of Palpa and the Khan Kings extended their kingdom towards north and east of Bhirkot.
When the Hindu missionaries began to spread Hinduism in the Western Nepal, the Shah King of Palpa was the first to be converted into Hinduism and became a Hindu Rajput King and claimed his descent from Sen family of India. His name was Chilla Rai. Similarly, when Hindu missionaries approached the Chief of Bhirkot, who was of Khan family, for conversion, he refused them and remained a pure Magar King. His name was Khan Chha Khan which means the King's Son King.

The Hindu missionaries then approached the second prince whose name was Mechha Khan or the youngest son king. The missionaries assured that he would also be a king like his elder brother if he would accept Hinduism. So, he gave his consent to them to convert him into Hinduism. Thus, the second prince of Bhirkot also became a Hindu Rajput and his religious priests made him the King of Nuwakot of Barah Mangrat. He was succeeded by Jaya Khan, Micha Khan, Bichitra Khan, Jagdeo Khan and Kulmandan Khan. From the time of this king, he changed his family title from Khan to Shah which carries the same meaning as king. The descendants of King Khanchha Khan of Bhirkot, though refused to accept Hinduism and agreed to abide by their own tribal culture, yet he with all his subjects were so much influenced by Hinduism that all the Magar tribes ceased to follow the teaching of their own tribal priest and followed the doctrine of Hindu priests with respect to birth, marriage and death ceremonies and those officials of the courts of Shan Kings and Khan Kings of Palpa and Bhirkot who could afford for conversion into Hinduism became Hindu Rajputs and called themselves Kshatris. In this way, the Magar Kings and their officials were converted into Hindu civilization. Yet in the middle of 18th century AD, King Prithvi Narayan Shah was very proud of calling himself the King of Mangrat. He has said in his Divya Updesh, "Mangrat of Raja mai hun", "I am the King of Mangrat". Lt. Col. E. Vansitart has also mentioned in his book called Gurkhas, that "the famous Prime Minister Bhimsen Thapa was the descendant of Magar Thapa family, as was also General Amar Singh Thapa".146 It is a known fact that the late Great King Prithvi Narayan Shan of Gurkha State had extended his Kingdom east and west by the strength of these Magar army.
The Magars or Mangars are divided into twelve tribes called Thapa, Rana, Ale, Pun, Burathoki, Gharti, Bohra, Roka, Chauhan, Konwar, Uchai and Jhakri and each tribe is subdivided into many clans.
Among them Thapa tribes are more in number. The Rana class of Magar tribes belonged to the same stock of Thapa but, when they were separated from their original group and lost for three generations, they settled in a place called Gurkha and called themselves by the name of Rana which mens chief. Thus, the habitants of Rana Magar became the Gurkha village. Later on, the Khas people came from Kumaon and Garhwal and mixed with the Magars and became one with them till they were not converted into Hinduism.
Although all Magars follow Hinduism, the Pun Magars of Tibetan frontier are still practice Buddhist religion and follow their tribal rites at their birth, marriage and death ceremonies.
Some of the Magar clans are as follows:
Thapa Magars
Baral, Balami, Baraghari, Sinjali, Bagale, Thapa consists of Atghari, Satgahari, Palungi, Darlam, Punwar, Setu, Singe, Roshala and Kala.

Gaha Thapa consists of Badchha, Chidi, Gora, Khan and Malangi.
Reshmi Thapa consists of Dangale, Gore and Thapa.
Saru Thapa consists of Jaurup, Japarluk, Jhenri and Paneti. Besides these, Gurbachan, Purbachan, Tangbachhan, Simai, Pithakote, Singali, Uchai, Pulami, Marunchan, Ramjali, Lamchhaney and Kalikotey.
Rana Magars
Assami, Arsami, Aslami, Bangling, Chumi, Charmi, Gharmi, Gyangmi, Kharka, Eyapchaki, Lungeli, Makkim, Pali, Panti, Rilami, Ruchal, Chitorey are famous.
Pun Magars
Birkali, Baijali, Phungali, Namjali, Balali, Tajali, Thakali, Sain, Sanangi, Sothi are famous.
Burathoki Magars
Balkoti, Deobal, Gamal, Karal, Ulange, Karmani, Pahari, Jujali, Pojonge, Thami, Ranju are famous.
Ale Magars
Argheli, Bili, Changi, Hiski, Hungchen, Lamjel, Limial, Roho, Rimal, Rakhal, Suyal, Sirpali, Sarangi are famous.
Gharti Magars
Baima, Banjali, Bulami, Dagami, Galami, Gamal, Kalikote, Masrangi, Pahari or Panre, Para, Phagami, Rangu, Rawal, Rijal, Same, Sawangi, Sene, Surai, Sinjapati, Talaji, There, Tirukia, Ulange and Wale are famous.
In my (the author’s) opinion the Magars had advanced much and had divided into two groups of higher and lower social standing and those who were of higher circle followed Hinduism and became themselves Thakurs or Kshetris and observed the strict formalities of Brahmanism whereas the people of lower circle were quite satisfied with their own familiar culture and did not mind to follow such strict rules of Hinduism and remained Magars, such as the Koch Kirat of Assam and North Bengal who were also converted into Hinduism and became themselves Rajbansi Kshetri and the people of lower circle remained Mech and Koch tribes."

From my friend Babs whos has shared this me in Orkut.

Sen Magar

" nice to know about this site, i was curious know the origin of magars , but still its doubt and complex,i guess , our origin was mixed with times with intruders. I feel these a very close link of some magar language with tibetian and other noprthern language, but still plenty magars are appear over eastern nepals and further east,was is that magars moved east wards while gaining infantry of soldiers by Prithivi narayan shah?? if it is so why plenty magars in high hills of myagdi and rolpa and Rukum which are semi mountain region, is that they took the title for becomong magars ? or they were the original magars ? but cant speak magars, why ?and i can guess there is strong language link between kaike and kham magars and kham magars with central magars. It is no doubt that sen are magars because i have my fren who is magar, Sen magar. he can speak Palpali magar,and as i am pun stil i cant.
any way we have to go minute research for the origin of magars.for this we have to make a group of people who is devoted for this kind of interests. To run this group we have to make donations and charities so that research goes on for success."

Source:  Magar Association Hong Kong - On Magar and Mukunda Sen of Palpa.htm

The reason I have choose this article to publish on my blog is that, author clearly established that Sen titles are also found in Magars.

Which is pretty interesting for me.

Ethnologue report for Magar

"

Language Family Trees

Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Himalayish, Mahakiranti, Kham-Magar-Chepang-Sunwari, Magar

Sino-Tibetan  (365)
Tibeto-Burman  (351)
Himalayish  (144)
Mahakiranti  (51)
Kham-Magar-Chepang-Sunwari  (14)
Magar (3)
MAGAR, EASTERN  [MGP] (Nepal)
MAGAR, WESTERN  [MRD] (Nepal)
RAJI  [RJI] (Nepal)
"

Source: Ethnologue report for Magar.htm

Kirat Vs Hinduism III

" Connexion of Mongolia and Kirat in Nepal Revealing the Mystery of Origin of Phallus Stone Worship. Now Kirat are very ancient tribe in history. They are the foremost settlers in the Himalayas region which was called "Kirat Desh" or "land of Kirat" in Veda and other ancient Hindu texts. Actually nobody knows when they came into Nepal because these people are mentioned in ancient religion book of Hindu like Veda, Puranas, and Ramayana and Mahabharata Epics. These people are also mentioned in ancient Greek history, Chinese history and Holy book of Sikh Guru Nanak. Kiratas are first mentioned in the Yajurveda (Shukla XXX.16; Krisha III.4,12,1), and in the Atharvaveda (X.4,14). These people are described in the ancient texts as indigenous people of Mongolian race, "gold-like", i.e, yellow in skin color with stout and short stature, high cheekbones, flat noses, narrow black eyes and thin mustaches and beards. They were brave and doughty warriors and very deft archers as described in the following verse; "Kairatam vesam asthaya kancana-druma-sannibham" Taking up a Kirata resemblance, like unto a tree of gold (IV,35,2); The Vedas, Ramayana and Mahabharata viewed them as fearful and terrible highlanders. The Ramayana describes: "Kiratasca tiksna-cudasca hemabhah priya-darsanah, antar-jala-cara ghora nara-vyaghra iti srutah" upon translation is The Kiratas, with hair done in pointed top-knots, pleasant to look upon, shining like gold, able to move under water, terrible, veritable tiger-men, so are they famed. The Greeks known the Kirats by the name of Kirhadai. The last remnant of the ancient Kiratite or Cherethite tribe was found recorded in the book of 2 Samuel, 15 - 18. They were a martial tribe during the reign of the Syrian King David in 1049 BC. Then think again who were living in the Harappan civilization? 1.The Manusmriti identifies the Kiratas as one of the eleven tribes who inhabited the Indus-Saraswoti region.(Tiwari, 2002) 2. Kiratas first appear in the Yajur Veda (Shukla XXX.16; Krisha III.4,12,1) and in the Atharva Veda (X.4,14), 1400 B.C- 1000 B.C 3.The Kiratas were forced to move away from their homeland, Indus-Saraswoti region and into the Himalayas.(Tiwari, 2002) 4. Kirat came to the Himalayas including Nepal in about 700 B.C. (Baburam Acharya) Hence it is not surprising that crude(origin )form of phallus stone worship(shivaism) is found to be in practice among present day Kiratis. So did the practice of phallus stone worship felled into the hands of vedic Aryans?" 

Source:Connexion of Mongolia-KiratRevealing the Mystery of Origin of Phallus Stone Worship - from Youtube(c).htm

The first half of the article is pretty interesting and has tried lot to find the root of Kirats. But the latter half clearly shows that authors like Tiwari and Baburam are trying to manipulate some facts. This article itself says to contradictory things like. First he said kirats had mangolian features and yellow skin, however in second half its says that kirats were forced to move away from Indus - Saraswati region. Pretty strange.

 I feel Tiwari and Baburam Acharya needs to check their logic, again.
  

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

"Thapa" - Meaning - in Nepali

"
थापा मगरहरूबारे संक्षिप्त चर्चा
_____________________

'थापा' अर्थात् 'थापा मगरहरु'लाई "नेपालको मगरातमा प्रचलित एक प्रसिद्ध थर" भनेर मगर भाषाको प्रसिद्ध कोशकार अर्थात् "मगर (ढूट) - खस-अंग्रेजी शव्दकोश" (प्रथम संस्करण असार २०६६ तदनुसार जून २००९ ) का प्रधान सम्पादक श्री हिरासिंह थापा (सोमसेन मगर) ले सो शव्दकोषको पृष्ठ ४२७ मा लेख्नु भएको छ ।

यसकुरालाई अरु स्पष्ट गर्दै उहाले "पूर्व मध्यकालतिर मगराँतको सिंजासाम्राज्यमा, महासामन्त सम्मको पदवी (नेपाली इतिहासकारहरुको मत), लोकको स्वामी" समेत भनेर लेख्नु भएको छ ।

उहाले यो 'थापा' शव्दको वर्णविन्यास यसरी गर्नु भएको छ : 'ठापा' > 'टापा' = 'टा' > घोडा + 'पा' > 'स्थान' वा 'ठाउँ' = 'घोडा हुने ठाउँ ' भ्रंश हुदै 'ठापा' > 'थापा' ।

यस 'थापा' शव्दलाई उहाले 'ठाहापा' पनि लेख्नु भएको छ । 'ठाहापा'लाई कालान्तरमा 'ज्ञानको मन्त्रणा गर्ने मन्त्री (वा) उत्तर-मध्यकालको काजी' भनेर पनि लेख्नु भएको छ ।

तर, हाम्रो भनाई अलिक फरक छ । त्यो के हो भने यो 'थापा' शव्द भोट-बर्मेली परिवारको हो । यसको अर्थ यसरी लगाउनु उपयुक्त हुन्छ : 'था' > सीमाना + 'पा'> 'मानिस', 'मान्छे' = अर्थात् 'मुलुकको रक्षा गर्ने, रक्षक, शूरवीर, प्रशासक' इत्यादि ।

अन्य मगरहरुको थर बारे बिस्तारै पोष्ट गरिनेछ ।

झोरा । "
 
Source: https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Magars-Their-History-Language-and-Culture/171605959649718?hc_location=stream

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Few things I would like to change in Nepal.

Everyone love their motherland and so do I.

Except, all the positive things about Nepal there is one naked truth. Nepal is among the poorest countries in the world. Though our leaders are busy in their own nitty gitty and probably they are the one who are least bother about the country.

I have jotted down few points, that might help in developing our nation. Though I have completely no idea whether its going to happen or not, or whether someone is going to do it or not.

1. Say bye to Vikramaditya's Calender and say Hi to Jesus's calender. One of the first basic thing which I feel is that if you want to grow accept everyone is following. Without this it will be difficult for us to relate ourselves with outside world. The finest example is that in earlier times those Magars who embrace aryan culture become Chettris and they become prosperous and came under noble caste.

2. Our leaders take all the inspirations from developed countries like federalism, in short include only those rules which will  benefit you and not the country. for example why not we can go only for twin party system and not the multi-party system like US and UK. In fact, Maoist which inspired from China has only one party in its country, if I am not wrong.

So instead of dividing our country in the name of federalism we should learn the good things from other countries. The perfect example is the demand of more seats in proportional system by small parties.

3. We should discourage the foreign employment. Its like we are a handicapped nation as we are depend on other nations. Why cant we develop the resources in our own country.

 

 

Saturday, August 17, 2013

Liglig Kot Kings (MAGAR KINGS - IV)

"Even today, once again, it is about the 'Ghale Raja' of Liglig Kot
__________________________________________

Even today, once again, writing is being done about the 'Ghale Raja' of Liglig Kot. We have been posting about this for some time now. The gender quote has a special significance in the history of modern Nepal. Drabya Shah conquered Gorkha only after eliminating the 'Ghale Raja' of Liglig Kot. After conquering Liglig Kot, it became easy for Drabya Shah to conquer Gorkha. Drabya Shah established the Shah dynasty in Gorkha by overthrowing the then 'Khadka Magar King' at midnight on Tuesday, September 8, 1616 BS, and his descendants expanded the Gorkha kingdom and made a quilt in today's Nepal. That Shah dynasty was also abolished on May 28, 2008.

Nowhere in this context have historians written clearly what the name of the Ghale king was or whether he was a Magar or a Gurung. Even if they don't really care about it, it could happen. Therefore, both the Gurung and Magar communities of Nepal have been considering the 'Ghale Raja' of Liglig Kot as their own community. We have also discussed this with two young journalists and researchers conducting field studies: Manoj Gharti Magar and Ranu Lamichhane Thapa Magar. We do not have any archeological inscriptions, copperplates or copperplates written about the 'Ghale Raja' of Liglig Kot. There is only what is written in the genealogy. Now let's talk about it briefly.

1) When analyzing on the basis of Historical Linguistics, it is necessary to discuss the word 'Liglig'. The word 'liglig' means 'good', 'charming', 'beautiful', 'clean', 'clear', 'smooth'. Concerned Adivasi tribes name any place in their language at the beginning. So there is no doubt that Liglig's name may have remained the same.

2) Now let's calculate or analyze the cultural attributes. Let's start with the story of Nepal's first historical film 'Seemarekha'. The film was made in 2054 BS with the investment of Dal Bahadur Budhathoki Magar and 3 other investors. The film shows a pig being slaughtered in a settlement near Liglig Kot. According to young journalists and researchers: Manoj Gharti Magar and Ranu Lamichhane Thapa Magar, the practice of slaughtering a pig by a Magar priest in Liglig Kot is still going on today. The custom of slaughtering a pig's calf in place of its goddess is a fundamental custom of the Magar people. We have to talk about Bajrayana, that is, Tantric Buddhists. While worshiping 'Bajrabhairav' of Gorkha Durbar, a pig's lamb was cut by a Magar priest and offered as a sacrifice, but it is necessary to understand what is done nowadays. The above historical film 'Seemarekha' has succeeded to some extent in conveying the message that the history of Nepal has been written incorrectly and that it should be corrected or now it should be written independently. That is, he has fulfilled his purpose to some extent. However, the two most important nouns used in the film: 'Hang' (King) and 'Bang' (Kingdom) have the exact opposite meaning, meaning 'Hang' is replaced by 'Bang' and 'Hang' is replaced by 'Hang'.  In the Magar language, 'hong' means 'king'. But in that film, 'Hong' means 'kingdom'. In fact, according to the language spoken by the Kham-speaking Magars, "Bang" means "flat plain" or "place". In any case, the film manages to convey the message that the producer wants to convey.

3) Now consider the historical records. Towards the end of 1349 BS, the Bikram Sambat 1402, the Muslim Nawab of Bengal, Samsuddin Ilyas, invaded the Kathmandu Valley and destroyed all the temples and idols of the gods and goddesses. Assuming that Pashupatinath's main penis was defiled because it was touched by a heretic, that penis is still in a corner of Pashupatinath's Patangini. Muslims do not touch pigs. In the history of medieval Nepal, it is understood that there were Magar kingdoms everywhere in western Nepal, even if those kingdoms were very small. It is not difficult to understand that the Magar priests have protected their cultural heritage by slaughtering pigs in the temple of their favorite goddess.

4) It is understood that after Dravya Shah established his authority in Liglig Kot, the descendants of Ghale Raja fled to the east. Ghale Magars still live in Udaipur, Khotang, Bhojpur, Dhankuta and other districts. More research is needed. However, it has been heard that a non-governmental committee has been formed to protect and promote Liglig Kot. 

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

MAGAR KINGS - III

Certainly don't want to miss the opportunity to enrich my knowledge of Magar.

Thank You Mr. B. K. Rana

" KASHMIR, KALHAN’S RAJTARANGINI AND THE 'MAGAR KING ARAMUDI' IN OBSCURE HISTORY

[There have been lots of research works on Mongols and Magyars but not that much on Mongols and the Magars of the Himalayan region. Some  Hungarian scholars believe their ancestors were from Central Asia and that is why (Alexander)Sándor Csoma de Körös went to the Himalayas in search of his ancestors but died en route in Darjeeling in 1842.] 
Aramudi, a name of considerable significance in the 8th century Himalayan history, particularly the history of Kashmir, hence both Nepal and India’s also but little explored and analyzed, still  romanticizes historians, researchers and general readers alike in the region. Historians have diverging views on “King Aramudi, who ruled Nepal, and who was possessed of wisdom and prowess, wished to prevail over him (King Jayapida) by cleverness”[1]. Whether this “famous king of Nepaldesh”[2]  was a king or a local ‘chieftain’[3] in the Kali Gandaki region, has been a question among the authorities. Marc Aurel Stein, who first translated Kalhan’s Rajtarangini into English approves of the battle of Kaligandaki in between Aramudi and Jayapida which Sylvain Levi has doubted. King Aramudi seems to have fallen prey to ‘Project Hinduization’ (Gurung, 1989)[4] or come within the virtual boundary of cultural modernization (Thapa, 2006)[5] in the country. If we believed in Levi’s discussion then Aramudi appears to us to be a Tibetan administrator posted at Kali Gandaki Region(Levi 1905 -08)[6]. Following, the Levian footmarks, multitudes of others have also nominated Aramudi to be a Tibetan administrator. Does King Aramudi’s battle with Kashmiri King Jayapida in Kali Gandaki belong to “domain of romance” ?[7] This question leads us to search through an obscure part of the Himalayan history relating to Kashmir’s also, which is made full of controversies by different scholars. I shall, in this paper, briefly attempt again[8]  to explore him in the ‘dark age of Nepalese history’[9] from a long range perspective.      
Whether King or Chieftain? 
Eminent historians of Nepal seem to have paused to place some importance or reference to Aramudi. Most of them either shy away from or simply despise his name and ambiguously and unconvincingly write he was king ‘Varmdev[10] of Nepal’, which this author had also mentioned in a short note, now deems as historically incorrect[11]. But, Kalhan has designated him “a famous king of Nepal[12] and also sung his glory along with Kashmiri King Jayapida in Rajtarangini’s chapter 4 – from  verses 531 to 586 - the history of Kings of Kashmir[13]. There are perceivable reasons behind Nepalese historians’ such a demonstrated reluctance: 
a) Firstly, the name – Aramudi -  itself.  It is a Tibeto-Burman name suffixed with ‘di’.  Truly so, it is  an unconventional name, not being in Sanskrit, given the prominence of Sanskrit language in South Asian history and contemporary society; 
b)  If it were a different Sanskrit name instead, there would have possibly been a general consensus in recognizing him as a powerful king of Nepal; 
c)If there were no mentioning of Kali Gandaki river in Rajtarangini, historians would have found an alley to bring him to Nepal – meaning present day - Kathmandu[14] - the seat of Nepalese civilization dating back at least up to 3rd century BC.[15]; 
d)‘Aramudi’ sounds an indigenous Magar name with an inflection ‘di’ suggesting – ‘water’ and also ‘river’. With the ‘di’ suffix, we may observe very common Sanskrit word ‘nadi’ > na+di; in which ‘na’ itself is not Sanskrit ‘negative’ in  this word[16]. (But in Tibetan water is ‘chu’. Tamangs and Gurungs call ‘kyu’ Cf. Magar ‘di’. More discussion to follow) 
e) There is no history of Aramudi in Nepal. 
Kali Gandaki Region : Traditional Homeland of the Magars:
Quite a few Nepalese historians have ever ventured to guesstimate that Aramudi was a Magar King by his ethnic origin because he hailed from Kaligandaki region or defeated Kashmiri king Jayapida on the bank of Kaligandaki River, or the mid-west Nepal which is primarily a traditional homeland of the Magars. But they have not  definitively mentioned him as a Magar by his origin. Given that the battle had taken place in the Magar heartland, we may therefore require to understand about the Magars of the Kali Gandaki region as well. The Magars are divided basically into seven groups or clans, with equal social standing, whom I shall put here in alphabetical order :  Ale, Budhathoki (cf. Budha), Gharti, Pun, Rana, Roka and Thapa. However, the ‘Budhathokis’ of mid-west Nepal and ‘Budhas’ of the west Nepal should be understood as the same Magar group[17]. 
The mid-west Nepal is traditional homeland of the Gurungs also. What is even interesting here is that Gurungs were also understood as the ‘Huns’[18] but they do not have ‘Pun’[19] sub-clan like the  Magars do have.  And these Gurungs are also divided  into ‘Char Jat’ > ‘4 castes’ and ‘Sorah Jat’ > ‘16 castes’ in which persisted debate until 1828 on relative status among the Gurungs themselves[20]. This ‘relative status’ among the Gurungs was derived from Hindu fourfold for ‘Char Jat’  > ‘4 Jats’ apparently making superior to other ‘16 Jats’ from ‘Bhasa Vamsavali’s marginalized ethnic or caste minorities of 13 are identifiable as inferior’ (Gurung – 1998). 
(Please read full paper in the attached Word or PD Files below or see in The Himalayan Voice also.)

[1]. Kalhana's Rajatarangini: A Chronicle of the Kings of Kashmir – Google Books – PP 170 http://tinyurl.com/3xvaneu

 [2]. Karna Singh – Kashmiretihas (History of Kashmir) – pp 99

[3]   Dilli Raman Regmi says he was a Magar Chief :http://www.dilliramanregmi.org/ancientnepal/content/content2.html
[4]   Hark Gurung: In reviewing the sweep of Nepalese history, Sylvain Levi, characterized the country as an “India in the making’ PP 188
[5]  Govinda P. Thapa : “One of the major themes in the history of Nepal has been the transmission of influences” into an original culture. http://magarstudiescenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/magar-history-revisited-latest.pdf
[6]  Aramudi has been considered a Tibetan by Sylvain Levi – Le Nepal PP 176.
[7]  V. A. Smith  - 1908: “The legend of his expedition against a king of Nepal, with the strange name  Aramudi, of his capture and imprisonment in a stone castle, and of his marvellous escape, equally belongs to the domain of romance.”
[9]. From 9th to 11th centuries, nothing has been explored so far of Nepal’s history. Therefore this period is also understood as the Dark Age in Nepalese history.
[10]King Jayapid of Kashmir invaded Nepal at the beginning of the 9th century.16 He was resisted by King Varmadev of Nepal on the banks of a river beyond the Gandaki” – Regmi Research - 1970 PP 3  Wordfile.
[11]  “Some historians write Aramudi was also known as Baradeva1[1] [Barah Dev?]. He had made Lalitpattan, present day Lalitpur, his capital.” https://sites.google.com/site/rana1616/king-aramudi-and-other-magar-rulers-of-nepal
[12].  Sanchhipta Magar Itihas ( A Concise History of Magars) – pp 25. Op cit “ atha armudi itii prasidhow mayabi nepaldesasya raja jayapidmabhisandhatumaichhat’ – Kashmiretihas – pp 99
[13] Kalhana’s Rajtarangini is the oldest written authority for the history of various dynasties that ruled Kashmir from the earliest period until Shaka Year of 1070
[14] The present day Kathmandu used to be then Kingdom of Nepal, believed to be founded by a sage named ‘Nemuni’. The naming of Kingdom of Nepal after ‘Nemuni’ has also been contested
[15]. King Ashok visited Nepal and gave away his daughter Charumati to a local prince in and developed few towns in the valley 249 BC.
[16]However, without Magar ‘di’ ‘na’ can become ‘negative’ in Sanskrit.
[17]. Budhathokis are little vague to understand as the Rana and Thapa Magars. This  Budhathoki surname  refers to some Chhetris also. The author has met some Budhathokis, who are   Shaukas in Rapla, Darchula District near the Tibetan border in between Nepal and India. But ‘Budha’ basically suggests Magars in Kham speaking areas. 
[18]. Janak Lal Sharma has also guesstimated Gurungs  to be  Huns  in his book Hamro Samaj: Ek Addhyan – 2036. 
[19]. Cf. ‘Hun’ and ‘Pun’
[20]. The first documentary evidence is a tamra-patra (copper plate) of 1828 which proclaimed that all Gurungs were of equal  status. – Hark Gurung  - 1998 - PP 193    "

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/rana1616/kashmir-kalhan-s-rajtarangini-and-the-magar-king-aramudi-in-obscure-history


MAGAR KINGS - II

" KING ARAMUDI AND OTHER MAGAR RULERS OF NEPAL
[Rudra Sen, one of King Jaya Sen's descendants, is said to have defeated the Palpali King. But a bewildered reader cannot find in the books of Nepalese history who that vanquished Palpali King really was there? This is a case that totally matches with the history of Khadga Magar King[12]  who was also killed in 1559 by Drabya Shah to found Shah Dynasty in Gorkha hilltop and rule Nepal until today. The vanquished King of Palpa also should have been none other than a Magar himself or one of the King Aramudi's descendants who was defeated by Ratna Sen.]

By  B. K. Rana
Aramudi was a ruler of Kali Gandaki Region approximately in the later half of 8th century AD. He seems to have ruled a strong kingdom in Kali Gandaki Region, possibly around the present-day Palpa of west Nepal. Or Palpa may have been the Kingdom King Aramudi ruled himself and also by his descendants in the later centuries. Some historians write Aramudi was also known as Baradeva[1] [Barah Dev?]. He had made Lalitpattan, present day Lalitpur, his capital. Historians differ on whether Aramudi in fact ruled Kathmandu Valley or Kali Gandaki Region referring to his unusual name not to be found in the list of the rulers of ancient Nepal. Some historians write Aramudi was a Magar King. Jayapid [782-813 AD][2] whose other name was Vinayaditta, a king of Kashmir, invaded Kali Gandaki Region, a traditional homeland of the Magars of Nepal. Aramudi resisted the invasion and virtually defeated Jayapid.
Kalhana’s Rajtarangini is the oldest written authority for the history of various dynasties that ruled Kashmir from the earliest period until Shaka Year of 1070[3]. It reads .Atha Aramudi iti prashiddha mayabi Nepaldeshasya Raja[4]. These words describe Aramudi as a powerful king of Nepaldesh. This line opens two avenues for discussion, either Aramudi had actually ruled over Kathmandu valley also or the Rajatarangini writer had problem in differentiating between Kali Gandaki Region and Nepaldesh. From the decline of Lichhavis until the beginning of Malla rule, Nepal's history enters a dark phase in which only Aramudi’ rule can be historically attested. Therefore historians treat Aramudi as the only shining star of the dark phase of Nepalese history. The Magars of Nepal as well as other historians[5] believe Aramudi was a Magar King. Unfortunately, very little has been explored on Aramudi’s life and achievements. Later on, different kingdoms[6] around River Kali Gandaki like: Rishing, Ghiring, Argha, Khachhi, Gulmi, Dhor, Satung, Paiung, Bhirkot, Gharung Mishikot, Isma seem to have emerged and ruled by Magar Kings. In those days, such twelve small kingdoms were collectively called .Barha Magarat[7]. a Confederation of Twelve Magar Kingdoms. There is an interesting folklore on how the twelve Magar Kingdoms were founded, expanded and ruled by twelve Magar sons of a powerful Magar King of the Magarat, the western part of Nepal. This folklore is still popular also among different Magar settlements in the Athar Magarat[8]. the Kham Magar Language speaking region[9] in west Nepal. Each year, people celebrate a festival of Barhakune Tal[10] in Ghorahi of Dang district to commemorate the founding of Twelve Magarats[11].
Palpa has always remained a home of the Magars. It is densely populated by the Magars. It appears that Palpa was a Magar kingdom, founded on the formidable strength and valour of Magars and their majority. The Magars of Palpa are still in strong majority today. It was a powerful kingdom in those days. The Kingdom of Palpa and Sen Kings have also played a major role in the history of modern Nepal. Ratna Sen was the last King of Chhitaurgarh, Rajasthan in India. When attacked by the enemies, his oldest son, Jaya Sen fled the country and took shelter in Prayag of Uttar Pradesh. Jaya Sen’s descendants while again chased by the Muslims fled to Ribdikot through Butwal in western plains of Nepal. Later on they seem to have taken shelter also in Rishing and Ghiring of Tanahu.
Rudra Sen, one of King Jaya Sen's descendants, is said to have defeated the Palpali King. But a bewildered reader cannot find in the books of Nepalese history who that vanquished Palpali King really was there? This is a case that totally matches with the history of Khadga Magar King[12]  who was also killed in 1559 by Drabya Shah to found Shah Dynasty in Gorkha hilltop and rule Nepal until today. The vanquished King of Palpa also should have been none other than a Magar himself or one of the King Aramudi's descendants who was defeated by Ratna Sen. One of the ...


[1] Aramudi was also known as Baradeva. He made Lalitpattan (Patan) his capital, He was a brave and clever king. http://www.infoclub.com.np/nepal/history/history_lichhavi.htm 
[2] Lalitaditya was a great, noble and famous king of Kashmir who made large number of conquests and ruled over Kashmir from 724 A.D. to 760 A.D. His son was Vajraditya and his youngest son was Jyapida alias Vinayaditta. http://ikashmir.org/snwakhlu/11.html 
[3] AD 1148 or BS 1204
[4] Rajtarangini: Kasmireitihas page 99.  There are a number of stanzas that describe  how Jayapid tried  to invade Nepaldesh and how Aramudi resisted or defeated.
[5] Historian Dilli Raman Regmi thinks Aramudi was a Magar Chief
http://www.dilliramanregmi.org/ancientnepal/content/content2.html but Prof. Jagadish Chandra Regmi  and Prof. Raja Ram Subedi believe Aramudi as Magar King of Kali Gandaki Area.
[6] I prefer using kingdoms to principalities
[7] Cf. Barha Magarat and Baradeva
[8] Literally, a confederation of eighteen Magar principalities
[9] Dang, Salyan, Pyuthan, Rukum, Rolpa  etc. districts of present Nepal.
[10] Twelve-cornered pond in Dang Valley
[11] Folklore on Barha Magrat and Baisbaju. 
[12] The Gorkha Vamshavali, the genealogy of ruling  Shah Kings    "

Source: https://sites.google.com/site/rana1616/king-aramudi-and-other-magar-rulers-of-nepal