Ads

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Kirat Vs Hinduism - I

An interesting article on relating Kirant and Hindu.

Well i am going to throw more insights about Kirant. The Kiranti came about after the Sensitization process in Nepal.
That is Kirat>> Kirant and Kirati>>Kiranti
Kirantis are the same non-Vedic tribes called Kiratas in Veda and many other ancient works such as Purano, Ramayana and Mahabharata epic.
Here's some of the work i have come across through my studies on these group. Only after studying the aboriginal tribes you would understand the roots of Hinduism better.

I have define Hinduism as below.

Hinduism =pre-vedic religion(aboriginal) + Vedic religion

Please note that the term Hinduism itself is a new word coined by scholars in about 19th century to differentiate all the religious practices in India that was different from Islam. Veda never said it was going to be call Hinduism.

Some definition of Hinduism are

Hinduism is the oldest world religion and began in North India. It was founded by a blend of conquered people of Indus and Aryan beliefs. It is a polytheistic religion.

Here's some short excerpt from scholars.

The religion of most of the ancient communities of the Central Himalaya was primarily based on the superstitious beliefs and was connected with the practice of sorcery,exorcism, and magic. The tree worship, the worship of Mother-Goddess and Chandika Devi, snake worship, stone worship in the form of linga or the cult of phallus, held very important place among the ethnic communities in ancient India. The aborigines of the mountain tribes of the country, who had not come into contacts with Brahmin's revered an invisible supreme spirit, various other evil spirits, minor deities.., etc the practice which still survives.

Shaivism:

Shiva, generally considered a non-aryan deity, secured a prominent place among the Kiratas.

It can be roughly asserted that Shiva-worship might have begun among the Kiratas in the mountainous regions of the Himalaya in pre-Vedic times, before the advent of aryans. Shaivism, in some form, was the prevailing religion of the aboriginal Kiratas.

On the basics of an episode described in the Mahabharata, as well as in the Kiratarjuniyam(Shiva in a form of Kirat fight against Arjun), of Bharavi, the Kirata may be identified with Shiva, and it may be suggested that Shiva was their popular deity.

Romila Thapar, while supporting this literary evidence, also has admitted that in all likelihood the Kiratas were the worshippers of Shiva. The assertion that Shiva, the god of the Himalayan mountain, was worshiped by the non-Vedic kiratas, can be proved in many ways. Some of the foreign scholars have also consolidated the concept that Shiva was a patron god of the aboriginals. Megasthenes has also referred to the two Indian deities-- Dionysus(identified with Shiva) and Herakles (identified with Krishna). The former was worshiped as the highest gods on the mountains and the latter was adored in the plains.Thus it is clear that the practice of worshiping Shiva might have begun much earlier to the Christian era, even though the Kiratas did not call themselves Shaivas.

Chandrapida, the prince of Ujjian, in course of his expedition against the Kiratas and the kindred tribes, inhabiting the vast tract of forest extending beyond Suvarnapura, as far as the mountain Kailash(the abode of Shiva) in Tibet, saw both the Shiva temple and a cave in its southern direction, as recorded by Banabhatta in his Kadambari.

That is a definite indication of Shiva worship in the Kirata region of the northern Himalaya. The concept of Shiva worship originally flourished among primitive tribes, living in the hills and forests --the Vratyas, the Nisadas, and other non-aryan. ~ Ancient communities of the Himalaya by Dinesh Prasad Saklani

"The clear conception of Siva arose in the Upanisadic age. Siva as been, for the first time, explicitly mentioned as the Aryan god in the Svetasvatara Upanisad in the background of Yoni-Linga relationship. There was never mention of Siva as Aryan god in Rig Veda, the oldest text of Aryan". From here it can be ascertain that Siva was worshiped by the aboriginal Kirata before the advent of Aryan. ~Tribal roots of Hinduism By Shiv Kumar Tiwari

The Aryan incorporated Sivaism which was the religion of the aboriginal Kirat people into Vedic religion and also other religion sects as given by scholars below;

According to "The Indo-Aryans of ancient South Asia" By George Erdosy, the primitive Saivisim, Vaishnavism, Sankhya and Yoga which are the four corner stone of modern Hinduism was recognized as non-vedic by the orthodox exponent of the Vedism in the early periods.

Kiratas along with other tribes non-conforming to Vedic teachings was classified as Mleccha(babarians) in many early texts, in a sense that they were destroyers of Aryan. Hence the Siva was name as destroyer in the Hindu Trinity. ~ G.P Singh (The Kiratas in Ancient India, 1990)

"When the Aryan found that their gods like Agni, Indra, Varun etc. were loosing popularity and people did not worshiped the gods which they brought, rather they were worshiping Subra(Siva)and following Saivisim, then they placed Sibarai worshiping under banned. At first the Aryanised conquerers held this religion (Saivism) in disdain and placed in under a ban. But it did not helped; ultimately peoples over come such banned and Saivism continued to strive among the aborigines. At the same time to secure easy recognition by the aboriginal people, they placed Siva into Hindu pantheon".

~ Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization By John Marshall, John Hubert Marshall Sir

Until you study the Kirat people, you won't understand the root of Hinduism or the early civilizations in India. Many books written about India and Indian civilizations are biased because many do not cover the aspects of the aboriginal tribes. (very true thing written by the author, actually the elite class had actuaaly ignore the other communities and always try to relate to tmeselves) Though many scholars have studied about Kiratas, these group are still unknown to the world because lack of much publications and largely because the Kirat people live in Nepal where the Brahmin's government have all sort of censorship and control for the past 250 years after coming to the power.

Million thanks to: http://rootsofshaivism-kiratas.blogspot.com/2009/06/roots-of-kiratas-shaivism.html

As I was going through this book History of Nepal, the thing I have realized is that the Nepalese history is entirely limited to kathmandu valley, you wont find the names of place outside valley there could be two possible reason for it one may be this literature writer didnt have much knowledge about the area outside valley or there may be nothing special about them.

The only name of places out side valley I have found in history books are palpa, nuwakot, bayise-chaubise rajya, however there is only name mention, not a little detail I have found on this rajyas. One of the reason being may be the lack of written history regarding these rajyas or if there is any destroyed by so called elite Nepalese history writters.

Again the history of Nepal (rather say kathmandu) thry have tried to create in this book is mix of myths and reality and keeping themselves in superior position. One thing I want to mention here is that the book mention the Hindu Trinity Gods Brahma, Vishnu & Shiva as just gods or tried to compare them with local dieties according to them its a God called Lokeshwara who created them and also in one of the page its also mentioned that Brahma was swipping road from where Lokeshwara  was supposed to pass. However, according to hindu belief they are self made. Again in this book they have tried to put that Hindu gods are originated from Buddhist gods. And I really want to praised the original author or myth maker by way he tried to relate Buddhism and Hinduism.

The thing I am trying to put forward is that the these so called history writers are the one who actually wrote the history they want or their raja want and whom they want to cater or impress.

The same thing is applicable with Magar beliefs. My personal opinion is that Magars are worshippers of nature. Again when these Brahmans come to Nepal to incorporate Magar into Hinduism they have relate their god or folk tale with the Magar beliefs. This actually how it works either you made them what you believe or they dont follow incorporate their belif in your believe. 

25 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. its quite ridiculous to say that shiva not a hindu god .. you also must study vedas where you will find clearly what you must know . The most important word om itself only and only mean to shiva himself .without shiva only a mad can imagine about any hinduism . Man you have studied and written what you want to and what favors your mentality .Specially about magars they came to the land after much much later . Yes i accept the land used to belong to rai,limbu, sunuwar etc people who first dwelled in kumaon hills and later migrated towards eastward . The times of vedas it was very very long back and budhism was introduced so after and budha himself was born in to a hindu dynasty . Hinduism is not a single way of worship here thousands of ways of offering are accepted and its unique blend of all beliefs born in to this land of south asia . and the most important is they all respect each others beliefs . Now in nepal nowadays a very tiny percent of people are trying to establish something new that hindus are not hindus actually its ridiculous . When today you talk about hindu its about 100 crore people not 1 million people . hear same shiva is worshipped as bhairava and offered sacrifices aand same shiva is spared of any such thing . shiva is worshipped as main yogi, aghori, natraj whatever u may imagine . and all are not listed in vedas as vedas does not tell you about tantras . The vedas are not history book its main phylosophical base for the faith .we accept the kiratis also may worship shiva in a form they recognise him and we have no objection . In vedas if you really want to know it is stated that all are created from a sigle tiniest dot and that dot is the main originator and source of all life and non lives and which is almighty which you may call god .This dot is Om , shiva , shakti brahma , bishnu, mahesh you may name anything . First if you want to go through roots of hinduism prepare for more generations as nobody till date has been declared as fully aware to this . this is not christianity or islam where u study a book and start briefing to others . hear you have right to study accept , not accept , adopt any form of culture but what ever way you do it main cause is the one and that is the creator . you may find him in tree, stone, air, fire, water or anything and the faith allows you to go through any way . many contradictions, many similarities all these you will find within what u call HINDUISM . If you are really in search of something you can have bath in this vast knowledge pool and if you are just a toy of christian missionery then we understand your intension and really ready to give you proper answer .In the history 1000 years of muslim occupation and 2-3 hundred years of christian occupation they could not wash away our phylosophy and our faith can you think about it ? when egypt was fully converted to islam in just 11 years and iran in 7 years, shiria in 5 years of time .Just think and think and think can you wipe our faith can you ??? We dont enforce anything on other by force thats why you are still able to talk about all these things with your poisonous mindset . In magars Mr kamal your type of people are not more then 2-3 percent dont ever think and dare dreaming what you have written in your script above . if we start leaving our traditional tollorence and start behave like any abrahmic religions your existance will not remain .We in all of south asia hindus are hindus and dont think with money being pounded from west to people like you in nepal you will make much ,, instead you are losing more . also think on this .

      Delete
    2. Mr kamal you will more praise on another person who is telling that lokeswara himself a form of lord vishnu and thats why hindus do worship lokeswara as vishnu and in tripitak you will not find any lokeswara in tripitak it tells you about therwad and there budha is not a god but just a brilliant human being ,, whereas in bajrayana sect budha is a god along with many more like tara,amoghsidhi lokeswara etc etc . I think you are still to go ahead of many studies . i request you not to post anything further until u are well studied upon a subject on which you are writing otherwise great comedy like above you are going to write further .

      Delete
    3. Dear Unknown,

      First of all I would like to add that these are purely my personal views as you have also said, there may be some error.

      But again I would like to put my opinion against your query, with the best of my knowledge.

      I didn't study Vedas but as far as I know, Vedas is all about praising gods like Indra, Agni, Varun & so on. Here, I would like to mention is that the Hindu religion we are practicing today is not the actual Vedic one, you should also study the history & evolution of Hinduism.

      Regarding who were the first inhabitants of Nepal, I have already given much evidence on my blog and going to put more as I go on.

      For your information Rai, Limbus are historically known as Kirats and they didn't come from Kumaon. The migration of mongoloid race in Nepal is from east to west however Khas migration was from west to east.

      I agree with your Buddha fact, however regarding worshiping ways in Hinduism you should first read the fact & History of Hinduism.

      Hindu are Hindu and I myself is Hindu.

      You yourself is saying all the forms of shiva is not mentioned in vedas. Then how can you say that all are the different form of Shiva.

      At last, whatever you have said is not relevent to me. If you still didn't understand me then I should make myself clearly that I am looking for the things which are related to Magars. Thats it.

      Also, the article has been taken from a website, where I have clearly mention the source. I have just choose the article because I find it interesting.

      Thank You.

      Delete
    4. Dear Unknown,

      Thank you, for my pointing my mistake, I really appreciate it and you are absolutely right. I am not a professional writer. You can say I am just compiling the articles which looks interesting to me.

      Everyone is learning anyway.

      Thank You.

      Delete
    5. Wrong info bro. All these stories written by different authors in their articles and u are and will not be valid.

      Delete
  2. Hi Richa,

    Again, I have to laud your effort to write such a complicated history and trace the roots of things that are frankly very difficult to trace and quite murky.

    I have read a bit about Aryan and Vedic religion but not from the mainstream point of view, that claims that the history of India is tied to the history of Hinduism (and similar in Nepal's case). Frankly that's absurd.

    You've pointed out clearly when and how Hinduism as a word was created. And if all evidence n arguments were to be studied, you can also say that Vedic religion didn't originate in India but was brought by the Aryan conquerors, much like Islam and Christianity. Which leaves us the question, what religion/s were practiced in India before the conquest of Aryans?

    If you look at the religious books of Jains and Buddhists, you'll learn a great deal about this question. Once the Buddha was asked the question - were you a follower of Veda?

    The Buddha answered - no. We (meaning his family) followed Shramana tradition. There were however, Vedic priests and ceremonies in this palace also.

    Now, you haven't mentioned Shramana tradition at all in your blog. I think you should research it if you want to learn the religious history of Bharatbarasha.

    Basically, Shramana/s were different groups or sects that rejected the Vedas and the caste system and was followed by the majority of indigenous Indians prior to the arrival of Vedic Aryans. Jainsim also falls under Shramanism. There were many other religious sects, even Shavism could also fall under Shranamism, but I'm not sure.

    In the history of India, Jainism is even older than Hinduism and is an indigenous religion of India. It did not start with Mahavira, who is roughly of the same period as the Buddha. If you read Jainism, you'll see that they claim their religion to be Santana Dharma, the words Hindus use to describe Hinduism frequently.

    Shranama tradition is much older and more philosophical compared to the Vedic tradition. The questions like 'what is life', enlightenment, seeking the truth, were things that preoccupied rich Shranama traditions of Indian, not Vedas. Vedas are all about nature worship. They worshiped forces of nature - agni, fire, etc...so your question that the Kirats or Mongoloid groups were nature worshipers aren't strictly correct. It was only after the Vedic Aryans came into contact with Shranama traditions that they started their philosophical journey. After this came rich and beautiful works like Upanishads and Vedanta that not many people read today. In fact, many scholars who have studied religious works of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism say Mahabharat and Ramayana was written only 1000 years back, or even later than that. There is no mention of these books in the religious works of 3 great religions, who were frequently debating and criticizing each other.

    That's a rather long comment. Hope it was interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Beautifully write.... There are lot of things to be understand... but surely keep our effort going for more and more facts and history about magars..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All we who lived since a thousand years except the religions that originated after 1st century are known as sanatana dharma which means way of life. People had different ways but goal was same to achieve the eternal bliss and to be absolute. Common goal is that we believe in me rather than my. So magars or brahmins who ever you are your goal is to stay peace,blissed and healthy.
      Thank you

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @MaGuRaLiTa... I guess u wanted to say something..

    ReplyDelete
  6. u can also refer the religion of bodo-kacharis if u want to know about sivaism locally called bathoism or subarai raja or siva. a true name of the kiratis. si= knowladge va= five (siva= a person know have the knowledge of five element(fire, water, air, earth, ether) known as panchabuta, with which he create the natural world).
    certain name of siva..hor hor mahadev- fire like almighty god.
    he is known as mwtai kotor(tripuri language)which is converted to Sanskrit as mahadev.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Truely, if we go deeper there will be more facts coming out...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Teej is not nepali festival and shiva is kirat god originally as discussed in this video. this vidoe is in the youtube where
    VIDU P. KAYASTHA said that Teej is not Nepal adivasi janajati festival and Lord Shiva is orginally Kirat God.
    When he said Kirat, it means adivasi janjati. The Aryan used to call adivasi janajajati as Kirat when the aryan arrived at the foothills of the Himalaas Nepal.

    Here's the video title and the link:
    VIDU P. KAYASTHA - Teej is not Nepal adivasi janajati festival, Lord Shiva is orginally Kirat God

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78kOsKr8fxw

    ReplyDelete
  9. its great to know that hinduism has roots from prevedic times,how does it matter which version one believes in? brahmins have done some terrible things in this country,this is nt the first example,sati ,castism,one should realize that this happens in all religions,men who come to power get corrupt,in our own texts its mentioned that shiva is supreme(devon ke dev mahadev),we already worship and follow him and know him to be supreme(it is also known that he is not a dev so they are telling truth and hiding truth in some places,but to reader it becomes clear that god shiva is a supreme being),he is called mahadev for a reason,they have hidden some instances when it is shown that brahma acknowledges(according to kirat beliefs) the greatness of shiva,we dont have any problems worshiping lord shiva in the past so this knowledge is really a seamless transition,what the brahmins have done is to take credit for aboriginals when they should have worked with them,it is also known now that 32,000 years old underwater city of dwarka(lord krishna's city) has been found(videos are thr on youtube as well search on google),which shows that lord krishnas historical presence before upanishads so more research needs to be done before the mind is set,but one thing is certain what ever we may believe lord krishna tells the people to do yoga(simple as well as higher forms)to increase spiritual awakening,we have all the pieces with us whether this or that all are already a part of us.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey AJ, if I want to add on your views. Teej is purely an Aryan festival. It doesn't belongs to Magar.

    The finest example is that nowdays also Magar women celebrate Teej but they are not in the actual rituals like fasting and all...

    ReplyDelete
  11. OK check this out how truth Indians really speak. Its been clearly known to more educated knowledge people that indians have been lying for 2 millenium years(2000) I hope people starts to open their eyes (Truth Hurts)Link/


    https://hinduismkisachai.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete
  12. BTW I believe SHIVA is a KIRATI GOD And Always will be.Hindus Are Really corrupted

    ReplyDelete
  13. Note that kiratas had been Worshipping Paruhang originally named KIRATI GOD later known as (SHIVA) LONG before inidian reached himalayas and starts Corrupting Kiratas Culture

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hinduism has been entitled the oldest religion... It's there for a reason ... scriptures were improvised by including every diety or power within its ideals... The revered and worshipped of nearby foreign cults found a place in their scripts.... Lord Shiva from mount Kailash, though his first image interpreted as barbarian warrior is found as destroyer and mahadeva... Lord Buddha , the enlightened preached his teaching of good virtue and morale, is found as incarnation ...
    I believe it's also because of the subjection of all other religions, gaining and learning in the process... It's reached height of prolific interest among us all. Well religion is a man made rule book with logical approach to promote acts of goodness in society

    ReplyDelete
  17. Lord shiva took his last breath in the rivers of Nepal where there is his tombstone

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hinduism came from kirata

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hahahaha! 😂😂😂

    ReplyDelete